Flux 3
The image engine- Text-to-image and instruction-following edits
- Up to 10 references, ratios 1:8–8:1, output to 4K
- Fast drafts at 1K for iteration
- Free starter credits, failed runs auto-refund
Flux 3 vs Kling 3.0
This is not really a fight — Flux 3 generates images, Kling 3.0 generates video, and both live in this studio. The useful question is which job is yours, and how the two chain together.
Verdict
The short answer
Different jobs, same wallet. Flux 3 is the image engine — drafts, edits, references, 4K stills. Kling 3.0 is the video engine — dramatic motion, multi-shot, element references, 3–15 second clips.
Kling 3.0
The video engine- Text-to-video and image-to-video, 3–15s clips
- Multi-shot storyboards and element references
- Optional generated audio per take
- Dramatic, high-energy motion from one line
Use Flux 3 for the still — concept, product shot, keyframe — then animate the winner with Kling 3.0. Same studio, same credits, no export step.
Specs
Spec sheet, side by side
Both columns read live from the studio catalog — both models run here.
 Flux 3 |  Kling 3.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Output | Images (JPG/PNG) | Video clips (MP4) |
| Made by | Black Forest Labs | Kuaishou |
| Inputs | Up to 10 | Up to 2 |
| Formats | 1:1 · 4:3 · 3:4 · 16:9 · 9:16 · 3:2 · 2:3 · auto | 16:9 · 9:16 · 1:1 |
| Duration / size | 1K · 2K | |
| Audio | — | Optional generated audio |
| Credit cost | desde 6 créditos | desde 42 créditos |
| Typical pick | Stills, product shots, edits | Motion, camera moves, clips |
Modelo de IA 6 créditos
Prompt0/2000
Evita personajes, logotipos y música con derechos de autor, así como contenido sensible o explícito; podría bloquearse.
Resolución
Relación de aspecto
Generación por lotes1
Costo estimado: 6 créditos
Tu creación aparecerá aquí
Elige un modelo, describe la toma y pulsa Generar.
Test it yourself
The same-prompt test bench
These prompts read as shots — run each on Flux 3 for the still, then on Kling 3.0 for the moving take, and compare what motion adds.
Tip: generate the still on Flux 3 first, then feed it to Kling 3.0 as a first frame — the classic image-to-video chain.
Product reveal
CommercialA perfume bottle on wet slate, slow orbit, mist drifting past, soft studio glints tracking across the glass.
What to compare: Flux 3: composition and material detail. Kling 3.0: how the reveal reads in motion.
Atmosphere
SceneA lantern-lit ramen shop window at night, rain streaking the glass, steam rising from bowls, cozy warm interior.
What to compare: Flux 3: lighting and set dressing. Kling 3.0: ambient motion — rain, steam, flicker.
Camera language
ShotSlow push-in on a vintage typewriter on a writer’s desk, morning light, dust motes in the air, shallow depth of field.
What to compare: Whether the framing reads as directed — push-in on video, focal depth on the still.
Deep dive
Flux 3 vs Kling 3.0 — an honest breakdown
Comparing an image model to a video model sounds like comparing a camera to a camcorder — true, and yet the question comes up constantly because they sit side by side in the same studio. Here is the practical split.
What each one actually does
Flux 3 is the studio’s image model: text-to-image, instruction-based editing, up to ten references, output to 4K. Kling 3.0 is Kuaishou’s video model: text-to-video and image-to-video in 3–15 second takes, multi-shot lists, element references, and optional generated audio.
Nothing about them overlaps — which is exactly why they chain well.
The chain that works
The reliable workflow: draft the keyframe on Flux 3 (cheap, fast, controllable), then hand the winning still to Kling 3.0’s image-to-video with a motion prompt — "slow orbit, mist drifts past". You get art direction from the image engine and motion from the video engine, instead of asking one model to guess both.
When Kling 3.0 alone is enough
For loose, energetic shots — stylized action, reveals, atmospheric b-roll — skip the still and go straight to text-to-video. Kling 3.0 composes dramatic motion from a single line; over-directing it with a keyframe can flatten the take.
Cost and credits
Both bill in the same credits — image renders per picture, video per second — with a live estimate before every run and automatic refunds on failure. Draft the still at 1K, draft the clip at 5 seconds, and only spend up on the take that works.
FAQ
Flux 3 vs Kling 3.0 FAQ
Understand the model, prepare better references, and choose a practical approach to your next image.
01Is Flux 3 or Kling 3.0 better?
They do different jobs — Flux 3 generates and edits images, Kling 3.0 generates video clips. The right pick depends on whether the deliverable is a still or a take.
02Can Kling 3.0 generate images?
Kling 3.0 in this studio is the video engine — for stills use Flux 3, then optionally animate the result via image-to-video.
03Can Flux 3 generate video?
Flux 3 is the image engine; the video lineup covers motion — Seedance 2.5, Veo 3.1, Kling 3.0, Wan 3.0, MiniMax H3. All share the same credits.
04Do my credits work on both?
Yes — one wallet across image and video models, with live estimates and automatic refunds on failed runs.
05Which is cheaper?
Per output, image renders cost far less than video takes — draft the concept on Flux 3 at 1K before spending on a clip.
Make the next idea visible
Tu próxima imagen está a un prompt de distancia
Bring a product reference, a character, or a clear headline. Explore a composition, refine the details, and save a version that fits your project.